No Mercy 2008
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
Was It Good
No Mercy 2008
What was your view on the title match between Beth and Candice Michelle?
I found the match to not offer Beth a real run for her money at all. I also don't understand why Candice was given a title match just like that.
I found the match to not offer Beth a real run for her money at all. I also don't understand why Candice was given a title match just like that.
Re: No Mercy 2008
lol! Sounds like a good reason to mebpglamazon91 wrote:I voted "yes" lol Cause Candice was owned by Beth!
No Mercy...
I voted "no" because although Beth retained her title (and rightfully so!), it would not have been so difficult for her as WWE would have us believe.
Glamafan- Moderator
-
Number of posts : 55
Age : 32
Location : Scotland
Job/hobbies : Reading, wrestling, listening to music, physics, feminism, politics, philosophy, exercising, walking
Humor : Sarcasm, smutty and black humour.
Registration date : 2008-10-14
Re: No Mercy 2008
Glamafan wrote:I voted "no" because although Beth retained her title (and rightfully so!), it would not have been so difficult for her as WWE would have us believe.
So true. WWE tries so hard to make us belive that Beth has to actually put up a fight against some of the divas. I would had hated to see Candice walk out with the title and not Beth.
Re: No Mercy 2008
Admin wrote:Glamafan wrote:I voted "no" because although Beth retained her title (and rightfully so!), it would not have been so difficult for her as WWE would have us believe.
So true. WWE tries so hard to make us belive that Beth has to actually put up a fight against some of the divas. I would had hated to see Candice walk out with the title and not Beth.
Yeah!Me too!Perhaps I will go to the main event someday and beat the hell outta Candice.
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum